Registrar transfers

Domains do not only get registered and dropped — they move. This is which legacy gTLD registrars gained domains from other registrars over Apr 2025 – Apr 2026, and which lost them, from the registries' own monthly reports to ICANN.

New gTLDs Legacy gTLDs All gTLDs
Registrars combined into families individual accreditations

Domains transferred by month, Apr 2025 – Apr 2026

Source: ICANN monthly registry reports

How much moving happens, over time. One line rather than two: at namespace level gains and losses are the same number, because every transfer has a gaining registrar and a losing one. Drag the strip below the chart to set any window — everything on this page follows it.

Apr 2025 – Apr 2026 1y 3y 5y 10y All
458.69k534.03k609.37k684.71k760.06kApr 2025Oct 2025Apr 2026
Drag to zoom
Domains transferred
7.45M
Apr 2025 – Apr 2026
Busiest month
739.27k
Mar 2026
Both sides agree to
99.98%
1,542 apart — unfiled reports
This says how many, not from whom. ICANN publishes each registrar's gains and each registrar's losses. It does not publish who transferred to whom, and the totals do not imply it: in .com alone those totals are 5,592 numbers describing 7,814,820 possible flows between 2,796 registrars, so a great many completely different sets of routes produce exactly these figures. A pair can be bounded — the flow from one registrar to another is at most the smaller of one's losses and the other's gains — and for the large registrars that bound is nearly the whole column, so it is not published either. Which clock this is on.
Showing individual ICANN accreditations. This matches ICANN's reports line for line, and it attributes internal moves as though they were the market: 44.5% of the transfer volume here belongs to registrars inside a family, and the largest gainer and largest loser below may be two arms of one company.

Biggest net gainers

Source: ICANN monthly registry reports

Transfers in minus transfers out, over Apr 2025 – Apr 2026. Bar length is the net; the label gives both directions.

Gname.com Pte. Ltd. 1,286,619 in / 76,327 out
1.21M
Cloudflare, Inc. 404,616 in / 29,805 out
374.81k
Spaceship, Inc. 467,016 in / 130,703 out
336.31k
Unstoppable Domains Inc. 305,188 in / 14,704 out
290.48k
Wix.com Ltd. 242,280 in / 75,718 out
166.56k
HOSTINGER operations, UAB 230,330 in / 70,605 out
159.73k
GoDaddy.com, LLC 938,020 in / 844,993 out
93,027
Porkbun LLC 141,366 in / 61,137 out
80,229
73,560
68,106

Biggest net losers

Source: ICANN monthly registry reports

The same figure the other way. A registrar can lose heavily and still grow, if it registers more than it loses.

Network Solutions, LLC 62,961 in / 392,608 out
329.65k
eNom, LLC 27,537 in / 196,214 out
168.68k
eName Technology Co., Ltd. 7,495 in / 171,296 out
163.80k
Tucows Domains Inc. 138,701 in / 298,143 out
159.44k
Squarespace Domains II LLC 618 in / 152,926 out
152.31k
115.42k
Sav.com, LLC 49,313 in / 134,003 out
84,690
Metaregistrar BV 5,099 in / 64,582 out
59,483
2,918 accreditations

Showing 100 of 2,918 registrars, sorted by net transfers. Every column heading sorts; paging is below.

Registrar Domains In Out Net Turnover TLDs
Gname 230 Inc 1,415 0 733 ▼ -733 30.86% 3
Gname 275 Inc 1,399 0 734 ▼ -734 30.93% 3
Gname 193 Inc 1,474 0 735 ▼ -735 31.57% 3
Gname 252 Inc 1,440 0 735 ▼ -735 32.05% 3
Gname 294 Inc 1,505 0 735 ▼ -735 31.53% 3
Gname 163 Inc 1,496 0 736 ▼ -736 32.55% 3
Gname 246 Inc 1,448 0 737 ▼ -737 31.31% 3
Gname 273 Inc 1,450 0 738 ▼ -738 31.99% 3
Gname 232 Inc 1,485 0 740 ▼ -740 30.50% 3
Gname 288 Inc 1,479 0 740 ▼ -740 31.56% 3
Gname 107 Inc 1,501 0 741 ▼ -741 31.51% 3
Gname 212 Inc 1,490 0 741 ▼ -741 31.95% 3
Gname 291 Inc 1,431 0 741 ▼ -741 32.59% 3
Gname 147 Inc 1,467 0 743 ▼ -743 32.46% 3
Gname 168 Inc 1,465 0 743 ▼ -743 32.54% 3
Gname 198 Inc 1,430 0 743 ▼ -743 31.86% 3
Gname 235 Inc 1,416 0 743 ▼ -743 30.63% 3
Gname 268 Inc 1,496 0 743 ▼ -743 33.07% 3
Paknic (Private) Limited 11,879 41 784 ▼ -743 3.98% 13
Gname 172 Inc 1,499 0 744 ▼ -744 31.67% 3
Gname 281 Inc 1,388 0 744 ▼ -744 31.21% 3
Gname 112 Inc 1,523 0 745 ▼ -745 32.50% 3
Gname 123 Inc 1,395 0 745 ▼ -745 32.08% 3
Gname 236 Inc 1,452 0 745 ▼ -745 30.46% 3
Gname 248 Inc 1,465 0 745 ▼ -745 29.98% 3
Gname 170 Inc 1,462 0 746 ▼ -746 32.28% 3
Gname 205 Inc 1,383 0 746 ▼ -746 33.17% 3
Gname 259 Inc 1,453 0 746 ▼ -746 32.73% 3
Gname 261 Inc 1,499 0 746 ▼ -746 32.31% 3
Gname 142 Inc 1,439 0 747 ▼ -747 31.84% 3
Gname 152 Inc 1,501 0 747 ▼ -747 32.55% 3
Gname 143 Inc 1,456 0 748 ▼ -748 32.68% 3
Gname 178 Inc 1,454 0 748 ▼ -748 31.91% 3
Gname 187 Inc 1,443 0 748 ▼ -748 31.43% 3
Gname 153 Inc 1,473 0 749 ▼ -749 32.84% 3
Gname 220 Inc 1,455 0 749 ▼ -749 32.33% 3
Gname 238 Inc 1,496 0 749 ▼ -749 30.89% 3
Gname 280 Inc 1,411 0 749 ▼ -749 31.91% 3
Gname 131 Inc 1,461 0 751 ▼ -751 32.64% 3
Gname 221 Inc 1,429 0 751 ▼ -751 32.52% 3
Gname 245 Inc 1,361 0 751 ▼ -751 31.23% 3
Gname 111 Inc 1,536 0 752 ▼ -752 31.85% 3
Gname 241 Inc 1,429 0 752 ▼ -752 30.09% 3
Gname 262 Inc 1,424 0 752 ▼ -752 32.97% 3
Gname 271 Inc 1,377 0 752 ▼ -752 32.84% 3
Gname 159 Inc 1,617 0 753 ▼ -753 31.49% 3
Gname 166 Inc 1,509 0 753 ▼ -753 32.67% 3
Gname 194 Inc 1,451 0 753 ▼ -753 32.75% 3
Gname 231 Inc 1,465 0 753 ▼ -753 31.68% 3
Gname 255 Inc 1,503 0 753 ▼ -753 32.08% 3
Gname 127 Inc 1,457 0 754 ▼ -754 32.03% 3
Gname 244 Inc 1,440 0 754 ▼ -754 30.58% 3
Gname 113 Inc 1,463 0 755 ▼ -755 32.66% 3
Gname 257 Inc 1,551 0 755 ▼ -755 31.80% 3
Gname 228 Inc 1,436 0 757 ▼ -757 32.01% 3
Gname 274 Inc 1,460 0 757 ▼ -757 34.07% 3
GLOBAL ASSET DOMAINS INC. 1,467 0 758 ▼ -758 31.98% 3
Gname 263 Inc 1,383 0 759 ▼ -759 32.65% 3
Gname 103 Inc 1,500 0 760 ▼ -760 31.68% 3
Gname 132 Inc 1,455 0 760 ▼ -760 32.38% 3
Gname 167 Inc 1,526 0 760 ▼ -760 32.56% 3
Gname 130 Inc 1,442 0 761 ▼ -761 32.89% 3
Gname 150 Inc 1,472 0 762 ▼ -762 32.27% 3
Gname 174 Inc 1,446 0 762 ▼ -762 32.84% 3
Gname 213 Inc 1,348 0 762 ▼ -762 34.65% 3
Gname 243 Inc 1,499 0 762 ▼ -762 31.55% 3
Gname 189 Inc 1,451 0 763 ▼ -763 32.52% 3
Gname 106 Inc 1,553 0 764 ▼ -764 33.61% 3
Gname 161 Inc 1,611 0 764 ▼ -764 32.02% 3
Gname 184 Inc 1,541 0 764 ▼ -764 33.02% 3
Gname 292 Inc 1,547 0 764 ▼ -764 31.94% 3
Gname 151 Inc 1,465 0 765 ▼ -765 32.14% 3
DDD TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. 4,031 308 1,074 ▼ -766 26.17% 13
Gname 164 Inc 1,494 0 766 ▼ -766 32.81% 3
Gname 180 Inc 1,504 0 767 ▼ -767 32.27% 3
Gname 183 Inc 1,454 0 767 ▼ -767 33.28% 3
Gname 249 Inc 1,450 0 767 ▼ -767 31.15% 3
Gname 186 Inc 1,458 0 768 ▼ -768 33.03% 3
Gname 104 Inc 1,595 0 769 ▼ -769 33.16% 3
Gname 116 Inc 1,452 0 769 ▼ -769 32.64% 3
Gname 140 Inc 1,391 0 769 ▼ -769 31.87% 3
Gname 171 Inc 1,400 0 769 ▼ -769 32.74% 3
Gname 233 Inc 1,487 0 769 ▼ -769 31.82% 3
Gname 119 Inc 1,457 0 770 ▼ -770 32.53% 3
Gname 139 Inc 1,481 0 770 ▼ -770 32.22% 3
Gname 258 Inc 1,457 0 770 ▼ -770 33.35% 3
Gname 267 Inc 1,452 0 770 ▼ -770 32.88% 3
Gname 285 Inc 1,392 0 770 ▼ -770 32.82% 3
Gname 157 Inc 1,507 0 771 ▼ -771 32.34% 3
Gname 181 Inc 1,450 0 771 ▼ -771 33.86% 3
Gname 250 Inc 1,453 0 771 ▼ -771 31.74% 3
Gname 122 Inc 1,488 0 772 ▼ -772 33.23% 3
Gname 196 Inc 1,402 0 772 ▼ -772 33.43% 3
Gname 240 Inc 1,401 0 772 ▼ -772 31.84% 3
Gname 247 Inc 1,302 0 773 ▼ -773 32.94% 3
Gname 145 Inc 1,443 0 774 ▼ -774 32.14% 3
Gname 148 Inc 1,448 0 774 ▼ -774 33.13% 3
Gname 177 Inc 1,450 0 774 ▼ -774 31.93% 3
Gname 110 Inc 1,590 0 775 ▼ -775 31.41% 3
Gname 115 Inc 1,520 0 775 ▼ -775 32.54% 3

Turnover is transfers in plus transfers out, against the largest book the registrar held during the window. It measures how much of a book moved rather than which way: a registrar that gained 20,000 and lost 20,000 has a net of nothing and has still had 40,000 domains change hands. Above 100% is possible and not a mistake: a year of movement can exceed any single month's holdings, because a domain can be registered and transferred away inside the same year. It means the equivalent of more than the whole book changed hands.

Data currency. Domain counts on this page are from zone files dated and refresh daily. Registrar figures are from ICANN's monthly registry reports for April 2026, which ICANN publishes about three months in arrears; zone files contain no registrar information, so no fresher source exists. Full detail on methodology and live pipeline status.